Let's set aside the fact that the ad crams so much text on screen that I can barely read it. But a few questions should jump out:
First, I am not an energy policy-maker. So why is the company paying to serve me this ad at all?
Second, why would the company think that I have any particular interest in their executive Q&A?
Now don't get me wrong. I'm sure if I were to read deeper, the discussion of wholesale power market governance in CAISO would be juicier than the Taylor Swift/Blake Lively texts. But let's stipulate that the company running this ad has no reason to think that I am in the market for energy policy more than I am the (taupe?) blazer in the first ad.
Which ad do you think I'm more likely to engage with?
And why is a pants retailer who has vertically expanded into covering torsos, executing a more relevant ad campaign than one of the largest energy companies in the country?
Finally, candidly ask yourself—is your messaging "tailored," like the blazer ad? Or does that energy company's ad feel a little too close to home?
We'll pick up the answers to these questions here next week.