Why The Press Can't Resist An AI Disaster
Let's start with why these stories tend to dominate AI headlines. AI failures are the perfect storm of clickbait: they're novel, they tap into primal fears about technology run amok, and they give people that smug feeling of: "I knew it was overhyped."
Consider the San Francisco power outage that left Waymos confused and blocking intersections. Fair criticism, certainly. But what barely got noticed is that when the lights went out, human drivers were also stuck in traffic. Some ran red lights. Some caused accidents. Some just sat there honking. But "Robot Cars Get Stuck in Power Outage" gets more clicks than "Traffic Jam Occurs During Power Outage."
Then there's the Bing chatbot that told a New York Times reporter to leave his wife. Yes, it happened. And yes, it was bold of a non-sentient being. But let's put this in perspective: millions of people use AI assistants every day without being told to blow up their marriages. But you know what does give terrible relationship advice at scale? Instagram influencers, bar conversations at 2am, and whoever wrote "He's Just Not That Into You." But "Man Gets Bad Advice From AI" became front-page news because it was weird and new.
Or take Google's AI overview that confidently told users to add glue to pizza sauce to make the cheese stick better. This was certainly odd culinary advice. But it's also true that millions of people use AI every day without being told to consume adhesives. You know what does give terrible advice at scale? Random internet forums, your uncle's Facebook posts, and that friend who thinks they're a DIY expert. But "Man Gives Bad Advice" isn't a headline.